WE'VE MOVED!

This site have moved to a new location. You will be redirected to its new home in about 8 seconds. Please update your Bookmarks to reflect the new address and follow us there!
Showing posts with label Sarah Palin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sarah Palin. Show all posts

Monday, February 8, 2010

That woman Palin

That woman Palin never ceases to amaze me! I read here about her using handnotes. But why is this such a big deal? I've seen a lot of speakers with pages of notes and even uses a teleprompter in giving their speech but Sarah could wing hers with just a few words scribbled in the palm of her hand. What she did was actually smart and admirable. She is truly inspiring a lot of people and if I may borrow one reader's comment:

God bless Sarah. She has handled the constant bashing from the media and the left very well. I can almost hear the sounds of libs thinking: “Why can’t our side have a Sarah Palin?”
and another...

As to those notes on her hand, so what? It’s not like she was reading a prepared script. It shows that she was prepared. There is nothing worse than having to listen to a speaker who comes unprepared. It shows a lack of respect for the audience. And we all have our ways of making sure we don’t forget a name we can never seem to remember.
Exactly.

Continue Reading...

Monday, August 3, 2009

Sarah Palin and Todd Palin breaking up story

The news started from this blog and I found it a big time 'rediculous'. When I read it, I thought this didn't sound right because it was more like a gossip although he kept on saying it was from a reliable source. In my opinion, it was a pure gossip, completely fabricated to attack and destroy Sarah Palin. The post was not believable to me at all. We've heard and seen in the past how Sarah's family was so intact no matter what comes their way. We also have read that many people are envious of Sarah for having everything that most women would want to have in their lives and themselves: beauty, brain, wonderful husband, many children, successful political career, etc. But then, it's so easy to tell if the rumor is true because sooner or later, it will reveal itself. Sarah has spoken about this and have asked the media and bloggers to stop making up stories and that she and Todd are still very much married.

Yet again, some so-called journalists have decided to make up a story. There is no truth to the recent "story" (and story is the correct term for this type of fiction) that the Palins are divorcing. The Palins remain married, committed to each other and their family, and have not purchased land in Montana (last week it was reported to be Long Island).
Less than one week ago, Governor Palin asked the media to 'quit making things up. We appreciate that the more professional journalists decided to question this story before repeating it.
A letter from Sarah's attorney had issued a warning to the blogger laught it off with a response:

"Nothing that I wrote in my post was meant to be malicious. I trust my source and simply reported what I had been told.
Threatening to serve legal papers to an educator in a room full of five year olds? Now that is malicious."
Well, in my opinion, I think this person is more of a gossiper than an educator because of the way he uses his so called education and kindergarten as a shield from libel.

To me, it's simple. If we don't see Sarah and Todd together anymore, then that's a good basis. So, let's just wait and see and don't just believe in this kind of gossip.

Continue Reading...

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Poll: Nearly 80% Support Palin 2012 Run

An Internet poll sponsored by Newsmax.com reveals that nearly four out of five respondents would support Sarah Palin as the Republican nominee for president in 2012.

A slightly larger majority believe the then-Alaska governor helped John McCain in the 2008 presidential race — while only 31 percent think McCain did a good job running for president.

The poll drew more than 600,000 responses, and Newsmax will provide the results to major media and share them with radio talk show hosts across the country.

Here are the poll questions and results:

1) What is your opinion of Sarah Palin?
Favorable: 83 percent
Unfavorable: 17 percent

2) Do you believe Sarah Palin as a running mate helped or hurt John McCain?
Helped: 80 percent
Hurt: 20 percent

3) In the election between McCain-Palin and Obama-Biden, who did you vote for?
McCain-Palin: 81 percent
Obama-Biden: 16 percent
Other: 3 percent

4) Would you support Sarah Palin as the Republican nominee for president in 2012?
Yes: 78 percent
No: 22 percent

5) Do you believe McCain did a good job running for president?
Good Job: 31 percent
Bad Job: 69 percent

6) Do you believe Barack Obama "bought" the White House by outspending McCain?
Yes: 72 percent
No: 28 percent

You Can Still Vote in the Newsmax Poll on Sarah Palin - Click Here Now

[Jim Meyers/Newsmax]

Continue Reading...

Monday, July 27, 2009

Sarah Palin vows to fight harder

As Sarah Palin handed over the Alaska governorship this weekend, the wear, tear and resentments of a year on the big stage were evident for the former GOP vice presidential candidate.

Sarah Palin on Sunday says she'll continue to fight "for what is right, and for truth."

Her parting words Sunday included a parting shot at the media:

"So how about in honor of the American soldier, you quit making up things. And don't underestimate the wisdom of the people. And one other thing for the media -- our new governor has a very nice family, too, so leave his kids alone," she said as she handed off power to Sean Parnell, the lieutenant governor.

Palin's farewell to the governor's office was a three-day rolling picnic, from Wasilla to Anchorage to Fairbanks. Palin, a mother of five, was surrounded by friends and supporters.

"I will tell you one thing -- if we get a woman president, let it be her. She is a real woman. She knows what a woman is supposed to be. She is pro-life. She is pro-family. She is pro-woman," said Jon Eric Thompson, who attended the Sunday picnic in Fairbanks. [CNN]

Continue Reading...

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Websites reporting Palin is under investigation might face the court for defamation


"To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now claiming as 'fact' that Governor Palin resigned because she is 'under federal investigation' for embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to address such defamation," Van Flein said in a statement. "This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who re-publish the defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post, that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in a court of law." [YahooNews]

Continue Reading...

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

David Letterman's Palin joke and apology

SHOULD DAVID LETTERMAN BE FIRED?


THE DAMAGING JOKE AND THE APOLOGY:

Continue Reading...

Friday, November 7, 2008

McCain doomed by his aides then blamed on Palin

Read here.

To those top McCain advisers who leaked the little story about seeing Sarah Palin in a towel; to those who called her and her family "Wasilla hillbillies" while using her to stoke class warfare with red meat speeches and an anti-elitist message; to those who claim she didn't know Africa was a continent; to those McCain aides who say she is the reason they lost this election. Can I please remind you of one thing? You picked her.
And if I may borrow one reader’s comment:
Campbell, I'll take it one step further---if it were not for Sarah Palin I wound NOT have voted. I wanted a real conservative and McCain didn't fit the bill. Only when Sarah was added to the ticket did I feel compelled to vote.
Just who are these people?
"I won't comment on anyone's gossip or allegations that are based on anonymous sources," she said. "That's kind of a small, evidently bitter type of person, who would anonymously charge something foolish like that -- that I perhaps didn't know an answer to a question. So until I know who was talking about it, I won't have a comment on false allegations."
In response to the allegations that she was ill-prepared for interviews and debate, Randy Scheunemann, an aide assigned to Palin, called her "brilliant" and said she has a "photographic memory."

Continue Reading...

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Switching sides: Why Hillary Clinton supporters now supports Sarah Palin




Continue Reading...

Saturday, October 25, 2008

$150,000 designer clothes Palin said "not true"

VP candidate calls herself "frugal," insists she did not accept wardrobe from RNC and "that is not who we are."
Of the $150,000 spent by the Republican National Committee on clothing for the vice presidential candidate, $50,000 worth of clothes was returned immediately after the national convention, $50,000 worth hasn't been worn yet and $50,000 is being used by the Palin clan.

Sarah Palin told FOX News on Thursday that some of the clothes that were ill-fitting or just bought to be tried and possibly worn were returned right away.

Everything that "could be returned was," she said. Another third of the clothing remains unwrapped and packed in the belly of the vice presidential candidate's campaign plane and the rest is being worn.

Republican aides say the purchases were necessary because the family was whisked out of Alaska without notice, then scattered across the country for campaign activities not least of which was a week of convention appearances.

"Those clothes are not my property," Palin told FOX News' Sean Hannity. "We had three days (at the convention) of using clothes that the RNC purchased."

Palin added that she knows how to make a dollar work for her appearance.

"If people knew how Todd and I and our kids shop so frugally. My favorite shop is a consignment shop in Anchorage, Alaska, called 'Out of the Closet,' and my shoe store is called 'Shoe Fly' in Juneau, Alaska. It is ... not 5th Avenue type of shopping," Palin said, adding that the RNC purchases will either be returned or go to charity.

RNC officials would not explain why this explanation is surfacing days after the purchase appeared in news stories, advisers declined to answer. They did describe much of what Palin wears now as bought "off the sale rack from Macy's."

News of the purchases of designer clothes, largely from upscale Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus, contrasts with the image Palin has crafted as a typical "hockey mom."

McCain was asked several questions on Thursday about the shopping spree -- and he answered each one more or less the same way: Palin needed clothes and they'll be donated to charity.

He said his wardrobe was not purchased by the RNC. Asked Wednesday who had paid for the suit he was wearing, Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden told WSLS-TV in Roanoke, Va.: "I pay for my suits. I pay for all of my own clothing."

Also on Thursday, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, a private watchdog group in Washington, filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission against Palin, the Republican National Committee and several political operatives alleging that the purchase of clothing for Palin and her family violates Federal Election Campaign Act.

The law prohibits a candidate for federal office from converting campaign funds to personal use. CREW notes that FEC regulations make clear the prohibition applies to clothing but also provide that donations by candidates to charity are not for personal use. CREW argued this exception might apply to Palin's clothes but doesn't appear to apply to clothes for her family.

Palin, who is John McCain's vice presidential running mate, told The Chicago Tribune in an interview posted on the newspaper's Web site Thursday night that she finds a double standard in the questioning.

"I think Hillary Clinton was held to a different standard in her primary race," Palin said. "Do you remember the conversations that took place about her, say superficial things that they don't talk about with men, her wardrobe and her hairstyles, all of that? That's a bit of that double standard."

"It's kind of painful to be criticized for something when all the facts are not out there and are not reported," Palin said.
[The Associated Press contributed to this report.]

Continue Reading...

Friday, October 24, 2008

SNL Lorne Michaels on Palin: she's very powerful, people connect to her

SNL's Executive Producer Lorne Michaels' answer in an interview on what he think Palin gained from her appearance at Saturday Night Live:

I think Palin will continue to be underestimated for a while. I watched the way she connected with people, and she's powerful. Her politics aren't my politics. But you can see that she's a very powerful, very disciplined, incredibly gracious woman. This was her first time out and she's had a huge impact. People connect to her.
Exactly. That's how I feel too. People followed her like a star. Even as she was mocked at Saturday Night Live, she remained humble and a good sport. She may be be viciously attacked by the media but she's being admired so much by the voiceless majority.

Continue Reading...

Sarah Palin SNL Skits "Slander," CNN Owes Palin Apology

Newt Gingrich: Sarah Palin SNL Skits "Slander," CNN Owes Palin Apology
Newt Gingrich spoke to Greta Van Susteren Wednesday night about the media's treatment of Sarah Palin, and he described the treatment she has received from "Saturday Night Live" as "slander."

"This is a kind of deliberate, vicious, dishonest, total distortion of who Governor Palin is, including, by the way, the Saturday Night Live skits, some of which I think were slander and worthy of a lawsuit," the former Speaker of the House said. "I think the America people should realize that the elite media on the left is so desperate to elect Barack Obama that the view they're giving you of Sarah Palin is fundamentally a falsehood."

Gingrich also said CNN owes Palin an apology for misquoting a National Review article about her, and Katie Couric misquoted Henry Kissinger and the Bush Doctrine in order to "make Governor Palin look bad."

Watch Video:

Continue Reading...

The 'double standards' the media is playing

Saturday, the New York Times did a takeout on Cindy McCain that delved back into her problem with prescription pills. Yet when Hillary’s campaign manager, Mark Penn, brought up Obama’s cocaine use on “Hardball,” he was savaged by folks for whom the Times is the gold standard.

The people apparently had a “right to know” of Bush’s old DUI arrest a week before the 2000 election, but no right to know about how and when Obama was engaged in the criminal use of cocaine.

The media cannot get enough of the “Saturday Night Live” impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run them and run them to the merriment of all.

Can one imagine “Saturday Night Live” doing weekly send-ups of Michelle Obama and her “I’ve never been proud” of my country, this “just downright mean” America, using a black comedienne to mimic and mock her voice and accent?

“Saturday Night Live” would be facing hate crime charges.

How do we know? When the New Yorker ran a cartoon of Michelle in an Angela-Davis afro with an AK-47 slung over her shoulder, New Yorker editors had to go on national television to swear they were not mocking Michelle, but the conservatives who have so caricatured Michelle and The Messiah.

Is there a media double standard? You betcha. [PJB: Camp Followers]

Continue Reading...

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Again, Sarah Palin’s shopping a political double standard

Sarah Palin’s Shopping Spree: A Political Double Standard?
The mainstream media and liberals everywhere are aghast at how much the McCain camp spent on an apparent fashion overhaul for Sarah Palin.

The spending on so-called “campaign accessories” included bills totaling roughly $150,000.

An anchor at a prominent network (not FOX News) rudely sniffed that for the amount of money the campaign spent Palin should look better. (For the record I’m fairly certain this anchor does not shop at K-Mart.)

This is not taxpayer money. If the McCain camp wants to blow funds on some designer duds, that’s their prerogative. Might not be the most brilliant idea when you trail in fundraising, but it’s their decision as long as they haven’t violated any election laws.

Women traditionally endure exponentially more scrutiny than men. Hillary has been under the fashion microscope for almost two decades. That’s simply a fact, but it’s hardly fair.

The Los Angeles Times reported that Hillary’s jackets cost about $3,000, her shirts run to $1,350 and her pants hover around the $2,000 mark. Let’s do the math.

That’s over $6,000 a suit. And Hillary owns a lot of pants suits! And she looks great. If she didn’t, she’d be vilified for looking frumpy and lacking style-savvy the way she was in the 1990’s.

There is no question excessive primping and preening by presidential candidates is riddled with risk. John Edwards was lambasted over his $400 hair cuts in 2007 as was John McCain over his $520 Ferragamo shoes. We expect our candidates to look good, but not too good. We like a put together politician but have adverse reaction when we hear the price tag. For a newcomer like Palin, it’s par for the course that she’s stepped up her look. Imagine if she didn’t? She’d be the subject of more ridicule than she is now.

It’s not just Palin who realizes the benefits of being sharp dressed on the stump:

The San Francisco Chronicle reported that friends of Obama say the biggest change in him since his recent success on the national political scene is that he’s dressing better and shopping at the ultra-fashionable Barney’s because, for the first time in his life, he can afford to. Apparently “the fierce urgency of now” includes killer threads.

And how about Michelle Obama? The New York Times Style section published an entire article praising her new, and likely very pricey, sense of style. The purple Maria Pinto sheath she wore at a campaign rally retails for $900, and as the New York Times put it is: “not the kind of garment most working-class voters can reasonably aspire to.”

The current issue of Harper’s Bazaar notes that the Democratic presidential candiate’s wife wears Valentino, among others. Looks like when the Obamas say “spread the wealth around,” they mean at top shelf department stores.

I’m not outraged at this. The pressure of being in the public eye is understandable. What’s disturbing is the double standard. Michelle Obama gets hailed by the fashionistas while Palin gets crucified and mocked by the fashion police.

These same liberals who are now appalled at the Palin shopping spree are the same ones that thought it shallow and superficial to discuss Newsweek’s obvious recent cheap shot cover of Sarah Palin because we have more important fish to fry. Where are these people now to shout that this issue is trivial? And how do they manage to get so fired up about Palin’s appearance all of sudden?

I’m waiting for the left to condemn the insignificance of this story and I’m not holding my breath.


Continue Reading...

Sarah Palin's clothes not tax dollars, double standard

I can't believe that the political world would waste time on such issue. In my opinion, this is just another Palin bashing. Palin never presented herself in an extravagant manner, but now that she's running for a very high profile position, she needs to dress and look her best just like everybody else and why is that wrong all of a sudden? The commentary of Campbell Brown explains it more:

(CNN) -- There's been a lot of sniping and a lot of stories Wednesday about Gov. Sarah Palin's clothes.
Politico.com reports that the Republican National Committee spent more than $150,000 on clothes, hair and make-up for Palin on the campaign trail. Now, these are not your tax dollars.

This is money given by Republican donors to the RNC. But the report questions whether it is legal to use campaign cash for quote "personal use."
My issue? There is an incredible double-standard here, and we are ignoring a very simple reality.
Women are judged based on their appearance far, far more than men. That is a statement of fact.
There has been plenty of talk and plenty written about Sarah Palin's jackets, her hair and her looks. Sound familiar?
There was plenty of talk and plenty written about Sen. Hillary Clinton's looks, hair and pantsuits.
Compare that with the attention given to Sen. Barack Obama's $1,500 suits or Sen. John McCain's $520 Ferragamo shoes. There is no comparison.
Women get scrutinized based on appearance far more than men. And look, I speak from experience here. When I wear a bad outfit on the air, I get viewer e-mail complaining about it. A lot of e-mail. Seriously.
When Wolf Blitzer wears a not-so-great tie, how much e-mail do you think he gets? My point is for women, unfortunately, appearance is part of the job.
If Wolf or Anderson Cooper shows up on the air without makeup, you think you would even notice? I show up without makeup? Trust me, you'll notice.
This doesn't just apply to TV. All women in the public eye deal with this issue. And it is for this reason that I think the RNC should help Palin pay for clothes, hair and makeup. It is part of the job.
Now, you may think, that's an awful lot of money to spend on clothes, hair and makeup.
Or you may complain, as some have, that it's hypocritical to sell yourself as a "small-town hockey mom" when you are wearing designer clothes. That's fine, just don't ignore the fact that there is a double-standard here.
And personally I think in this campaign, with so much at stake, this is a peripheral issue.
I, myself, have raised plenty of questions about Sarah Palin, much to the annoyance of the McCain campaign. But those questions have been about her qualifications and experience, never her appearance.
Let's keep the focus on what really matters here.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Campbell Brown.

Continue Reading...

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Palin dubs Obama: 'Barack the Wealth Spender'

Taking “Joe the plumber” wordplay to an unprecedented new level, Sarah Palin on Monday dubbed Barack Obama “Barack the Wealth Spender” for his plan to offer tax credits to lower and middle-income wage earners.

Palin revealed the new moniker at an outdoor rally in Grand Junction, Colorado, where she also introduced a new working-class hero into the ever-expanding pantheon of “Joe the plumber”-types who oppose to Obama’s tax plan.
[From CNN Political Producer Peter Hamby]

Continue Reading...

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Sarah Palin draws big ratings for 'Saturday Night Live'

Sarah Palin was mocked at "Saturday Night Live" but she returned it with a big smile. She's such a good sport and humble. Anywhere she goes, she's drawing a huge crowd. I have to say - regardless of what people say and think of her -let's face it, she is going to do a good job for the country if elected. She may be inexperienced (so is Obama) but she is no dumb belle at all.
Watch a short clips of Sarah Palin's SNL appearance.

Continue Reading...

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Tina Fey On Sarah Palin: "If She Wins...I'm Leaving Earth"

Tina Fey told TVGuide she'll be "done" if John McCain and Sarah Palin win the election next month.

The "SNL" veteran who has come back to play the Republican Vice Presidential candidate (and whose own show, "30 Rock," is still nowhere to be seen), said, "We're gonna take it week by week. If she wins, I'm done. I can't do that for four years. And by 'I'm done,' I mean I'm leaving Earth."

Fey also said it's a busy but exciting time for "SNL."

"Election time is always good for [SNL] and this is a bonkers election," she said. "And that lady is a media star. She is a fascinating person, she's very likeable. She's fun to play, and the two bits with Amy [Poehler], that was super fun," Fey says.

Ok then, goodbye, Tina Fey!

Continue Reading...

The contrast between McCain-Obama, Palin-Biden

America faces a financial crisis which has thrown many millions of citizens into a great loss of confidence. McCain announces that he is going to Washington, suspending his campaign, and will be working to find a way to restore the faith of these frightened Americans who fear that another Great Depression is right around the corner; Obama pauses. Which will help him win more votes, going ahead with the debate sans McCain, or looking statesmanlike and joining McCain? Forget the long term consequences of the bailout (trust me, Obama never thought of those at all) or the wrangling over details of the bailout (Obama, in a pinch, can always vote "Present.") What does hesitancy say about Obama, the man? In time of national disaster, Barack Obama looks at us as voting blocs and not as human beings. Why? He will do anything to win.

The contrast between McCain and Obama is stark. The man who stayed in the horrors of Hanoi as a matter of honor faces the man who has never met an honor that he understood. The man who would rather lose an election than have his country lose a war faces the man who would watch amused as his countrymen descend into economic terror provided that his calculated neglect won him a few national percentage points.

The contrast between the vice presidential choices of McCain and Obama is just as stark. The woman who took on her own political party and who gave birth to a son with Down syndrome, because she believed abortion was wrong, faces a man who plagiarized in law school (so he could get his degree), who copied the speeches of Neil Kinnock (so he could win votes), and who seems to have never met an honorable sacrifice worth embracing.

The lust for power is not change. That lust is as old as history. It does not carry the seeds of hope within it. However packaged, the personal ambition to win at any cost is as ancient as lying, as old fashioned as theft, as commonplace as ward heelers. Electing men who figuratively will throw anyone under the bus to win, including, literally, their grandmother and their pastor, can never bring anything good. Such people do not just believe the grand malediction, "The end justifies the means," but they believe that they, personally, are that end.

Men who will do anything to win will end up doing nothing good at all. In college, it seems, Obama heard and spoke the word "power" as normal people would speak or hear the words "soul" or "honor" or "God." Power, alone, counts to him. He will do anything to win power, and men who will do anything to win power will do anything at all.[Taken from The Unspoken Campaign Message of Obama Bruce Walker is the author of Sinisterism: Secular Religion of the Lie, and the recently published book, The Swastika against the Cross: The Nazi War on Christianity]

Continue Reading...

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Palin Accidentally Reprimands Her Own Supporters (just a misunderstanding)

Palin accidentally aeprimands her own supporters and that's all that there is to it, it's accidental due to misunderstanding. No big deal. It can happen to any speaker who can't hear each other when attendance is overflowing.

From CBS News' Scott Conroy:

(RICHMOND, VA.) - Protesters at Sarah Palin’s rallies can always expect to be shot down with some choice words from the candidate. But at a rally here today, the confused Alaska governor mistakenly issued a stern rebuke to her own supporters.

The outdoor crowd was so massive that many were unable to hear Palin speak, so about midway through the Alaska governor’s remarks, some of them tried to take matters into their own hands, shouting in unison, “We can’t hear you!”

When that didn’t get the candidate’s attention, they tried a new tactic.

“Louder!” they shouted.

Palin appeared flustered as she stopped reading from the prepared remarks, which were coming across her teleprompter.

“I would hope at least that those protesters have the courage and the honor of thanking our veterans for giving them the right to protest!” she admonished the confused crowd.

Palin’s husband Todd tried to put an end to the awkward episode by approaching his wife on stage and telling her, “They just can’t hear you back there. That’s it.”

Palin responded, “OK. I’m doing that,” and then continued with her stump speech
.

Continue Reading...

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Are you being possessed by Sarah Palin?

Sarah Palin is ruining my life. I rant about her; I can't stop thinking about her; I cannot stand to look at her; I'm possessed by her!
There are two postings to the story:
First part is a post from Sarah Palin's "hater" and the writer's advice to her. [The Hater / Salon]
Second part is the response from a psychologist in two parts and these two parts is a must read.  [The response / Pajamasmedia] This is an interesting article so read all and feel free to give your comment.

Continue Reading...

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  © Free Blogger template Do you like my template? Get if from Ourblogtemplates.com 2008 | Showbiznippets 2008-2010

Back to TOP